Monday, October 13, 2008

SOA Workshop: Panel on Embedding Communications into IT Applications

This post builds on Enrico Ronco from Telecom Italia summaries on the Messages from the Panel on "Embedding Communications into IT Applications: A Vendor Perspective". Participating companies are: Accenture, Avaya, Oracle.

Avaya

- Need for an agile communication creation environment

- Deliver different level of granularity for different customers

- OASIS can help in filling some gaps (i.e. security, manageability, serviceability of “communication platforms”)

- Occasion for a full automation of business processes (incl. manual processes) – gave examples (sales force automation, extension of communication services with enterprise folders

Accenture

- How to implement SOA in a holistic view? (need for a proper governance capability)

- 4 different levels of maturity of SOA adoption in Telcos: (Plan & Organize, Deploy, Architected, Industrialized). Not necessary to run through them in sequence.

- Understand customer need, make a plan, iterate within phases (level 3 is the most difficult)

- The whole is difficult: services delivered by consultants, but failure in the achievement of the full business value. Difficult for a department to pay for others. Short term funding.

- Gives us a “recipe” for SOA adoption in Telcos: 1) Define governance framework and decide key roles (who should sit in this “board”); 2) define quick goals …

Oracle

- Bridging the “Web” world with the “Telco” world, and “Traditional Telcos” have goals which are different from the “Internet SP”

- Concept of “Standard-Based Service Delivery Platform”: --> look at the OMA OSE

- Then a “process” is suggested for successful deployment of the “Standard SDP

- Mention of TM Forum Service Delivery Framework (SDF)

- Mention of Oracle’s Application Integration Architecture

- No particular challenge in making things happen, but SOA is not yet "Carrier Grade"
- High availability, predictable low latencies, efficient, scalable …
- Difficult to guarantee throughput, SLA, QoS, lifecycle management of mash ups






No comments:

  • Categories

  •